Briefs from November Metro Committees: Metro Micro, Security, Service Changes, and More

Date:

This article first appeared at Streetsblog Los Angeles. Lead photo by Joe Linton/Streetsblog.

Last week, Metro board committees met to discuss and decide various items. Committee approvals are preliminary, pending approval at the upcoming full Metro board meeting on December 5.

Outsourcing Metro Micro Drivers

Just when you thought Metro’s inequitable inefficient low-ridership microtransit pilot couldn’t get it worse, it does. The one bright spot in the dismal Metro Micro program – the way Metro sold the program as being better than those mean old labor-busting contract-hire ride-hail companies – is that Metro Micro drivers are Metro staff.

Not for much longer.

Metro figured out that it could save a few bucks by outsourcing Metro Micro drivers. That proposal [staff

report] was approved last week by Metro’s Operations Committee.

This month Metro is looking to lock in about $22 million/year in indefinite Metro Micro contracts. Another overarching Metro Micro operations contract expected to come for board approval in January.

It remains astonishing that Metro is looking to lock in these outrageous costs for a system that is serving 2,000-2,500 riders per day countywide. At a time when Metro trains and buses are starting to get crowded due to increased ridership, it is folly to continue to throw operations funding at a failed MicroTransit pilot.

North County Shifts Transit Funds to Highway

Metro’s Planning Committee approved a North L.A. County subregion proposal [staff report] to shift transit funding to highway projects.

The action revokes $1.96 million previously allocated for transit capital [spreadsheet] for new bus service connecting to Vista Canyon Station and Valencia bus stop improvements.

The subregion proposed shifting those past transit funds, plus borrowing some future transit funds, to combine with future highway funding for a total of $17.75 million for Highway Efficiency Program [spreadsheet] projects. The funds will go to expanding interchanges on Highways 14 and 138, plus a bridge for drivers to get to Vista Canyon.

If approved by the Metro board, shifting these North County funds could set a harmful precedent.

There has some similar inter-program borrowing in the recent past (the South Bay approved the Inglewood People Mover project borrowing some non-transit funds). Many subregions would be happy to indefinitely delay all transit and active transportation funding and instead spend more and more on car capacity.

Transit Policing/Security Updates

Metro has been hosting transit policing listening sessions as it gears up its hiring process for a new in-house Chief of Police. Metro’s hiring schedule anticipates a new chief to be hired in or around March 2025. That chief will oversee the creation of an expanded in-house Metro police force to replace contracted law enforcement.

Station experience update slide – from Metro monthly policing update

Maybe you already heard (pun intended) that Metro recently expanded its anti-unhoused loud music to additional stations: Lake, Reseda, and Slauson.

For the latest on Metro security, see this month’s policing update and quarterly update on in-house policing implementation.

December Service Changes

Metro’s twice yearly service changes [staff reportpresentation] are coming up on Sunday, December 15. Changes include:

  • Line 96 (currently serving Burbank, Glendale, Griffith Park, Silver Lake, Elysian Valley, and Chinatown) will become new Line 296. Service will end at the Lincoln/Cypress A Line station instead of in Chinatown.
  • Line 260 (from Pasadena to Compton) will end at Rosa Parks Station instead of its current Artesia Station terminus. Corridor service will be split into two lines with the 260 ending at Rosa Parks and the 261 continuing to end at Artesia A Line Station.
  • Lines 177 and 256 will become Pasadena Transit Lines 53 and 33.
  • The G Line Bus Rapid Transit will run on Oxnard Street between Sepulveda Boulevard and Woodman Avenue, for approximately 18 months of construction of G Line upgrades. Van Nuys Boulevard bus stops will be impacted by East San Fernando Valley Rail construction.
  • Several additional bus frequency changes

report attachment outlines additional bus service routing changes planned to coincide with the opening of Metro’s LAX Transit Center, anticipated in early 2025.

Bus Speed Improvements

Metro’s quarterly Next Gen Bus Study update [staff report] included a brief preview of upcoming bus speed improvements.

Metro NextGen update slide featuring completed and upcoming bus improvements

Bus riders can look forward to faster bus speeds facilitated by:

  • New bus-only lanes coming soon to Florence Avenue and Santa Monica Boulevard
  • All-door boarding is expected to launch system-wide in the first quarter of calendar year 2025
  • On-bus camera enforcement of bus-only lanes is already in its warning period; citations will be issued beginning January 1, 2025
  • Upgraded transit signal priority coming to 2,000 signals

New Electric Bus Chargers

Metro’s Operations Committee approved $8 million to replace seven electric bus chargers along the G Line [staff report].

These chargers began service in 2021, as part of Metro’s initial pilot electric bus service on the Valley’s G Line BRT. In recent years, they had become unreliable, resulting in all-electric G Line service being replaced by natural gas buses during downtimes.

Dodgers Victory Parade Success

In addition to two years of steady everyday ridership growth, the Metro system saw a significant ridership spike on November 1, when around 80,000+ Dodgers fans took Metro to the team’s victory parade.

Dodgers parade update – via Metro Chief Operating Officer presentation

Metro increased frequency and capacity on A, E, B and D Lines. Even so, Metro reported many trains filled to capacity up to three hours before the parade and up to two hours after.

Culver City Grant Funding Revoked

Metro’s Planning Committee voted to take back about a half-million dollars in grant funding previously allocated to Culver City because the city is currently removing the grant-funded first/last-mile bike lanes installed in 2021. Read more about Culver City’s Metro grant de-obligation and changes in the city council there.

Joe Linton
Joe Lintonhttp://la.streetsblog.org
Joe Linton is editor of Los Angeles Streetsblog. He is also a longtime urban environmental activist. His main areas of interest have been restoring the Los Angeles River and fostering bicycling for everyday transportation. He’s worked for many Los Angeles livability non-profits, including Friends of the L.A. River, Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, C.I.C.L.E., Livable Places, and CicLAvia. He also served as deputy to Los Angeles City Councilmember Ed Reyes.

Share post:

More like this
Related

Neilson Way’s Slower Speed Limits Are Now Posted

In its most recent news roundup, the Ocean Park...

JAMS Students Embrace Civic Responsibility Through Mock Election and Insights from Senator Ben Allen

The following article was provided by SMMUSD.John Adams Middle...

Holiday Ferris Wheel Will Light Up This Week As Pier Celebrates the Holidays All Month

The following is a submission from Pier Communications.Pacific Park...

Help Us Reach Our End of the Year Fundraising Goal of $15,000

As we discussed earlier today, Santa Monica Next has...