Legislative Update: Mostly Positive Results for Active Transportation Bills at Midpoint

Date:

This story first appeared on Streetsblog San Francisco.

June 2 was the deadline for all bills to move from their house of origin or get nixed.

Here’s where we stand.

Bills moving forward

Stop Pretextual Policing
(S.B. 50, Bradford): A Biking Is Not a Crime measure, this bill would prohibit police officers from stopping or detaining a bike rider for a low-level infraction, such as riding on the sidewalk or riding without lights, to deter pretextual stops and searches. While its companion bill, A.B. 93 (Bryan) – which was an attempt to prohibit warrantless searches not based on suspicion of illegal activity – did not pass the Assembly, we’re encouraged by the support.

Bicycle Safety Stop
(A.B. 73, Boerner): It’s not a question of whether this bill, which would allow people on bikes to treat stop signs as yields when the right of way is clear, will pass the legislature, since it passed each of the last two sessions. The challenge will be convincing Governor Newsom not to veto it — again.

Regional Prioritization for Clean Transportation
(A.B. 6, Friedman): This vital bill, a version of which passed the legislature only to be vetoed by the governor in 2022, would require regional transportation agencies to prioritize and fund transportation projects that significantly contribute toward regional and state climate goals, divesting from projects that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and investing in transportation alternatives.

Daylighting to Save Lives
(A.B. 413, Lee): This bill would prohibit stopping, standing, or parking a vehicle within twenty feet of any unmarked or marked crosswalk to reduce lethal collisions.

Climate-First Transportation Planning
(A.B. 7, Friedman) This bill keeps getting better as it’s amended. As it stands now, it would require state transportation agencies to incorporate the principles of California’s Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI) and the federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in the project selection and implementation process.

Safe Sidewalk Riding
(A.B. 825, Bryan): Part of CalBike’s Biking Is Not a Crime slate, this measure would allow bicycle riding on a sidewalk adjacent to a street that does not include a Class I, Class II, or Class IV bikeway [bike path, lane, or protected lane, respectively]. It would protect pedestrians by requiring people on bikes to share the space responsibly and imposing a 10 mph speed limit on bikes. Despite some opposition, it’s moving forward. Note that in many places sidewalk riding is legal, although that isn’t always clear to either police or riders. In addition, L.A. County just clarified that bicycle riders are allowed to ride on sidewalks in unincorporated areas. This bill would expand the right statewide.

Decriminalize Transit Fare Evasion
(A.B. 819, Bryan): We’d like public transit to be free for everyone. Until then, this bill to decriminalize fare evasion by removing it as a misdemeanor classification is an excellent step in the right direction.

No More Warrants for Infractions
(A.B. 1266, Kalra): When someone doesn’t show up in court because of a traffic infraction, including bicyclists and pedestrians who get tickets, the judge can issue a bench warrant. If that person is later stopped (perhaps due to pretextual policing because of the color of their skin), they will have a warrant for their arrest and could be taken to jail. This measure would disallow the use of bench warrants for minor traffic infractions, thereby eliminating a pipeline that has often kept people struggling to get by stuck in a cycle of jail time and poverty.

Make Caltrans Freeway Data Public
(S.B. 695, Gonzalez): One of those wonky bills that could make a big difference, this would help advocates like CalBike uncover harmful freeway expansion projects whose funds could be better spent on active transportation.

Deadly Oversized Cars
(A.B. 251, Ward): This bill would create a task force to study the relationship between vehicle weight and injuries to pedestrians and cyclists and to study the costs and benefits of imposing a passenger vehicle weight fee. Heavier cars with taller grills are implicated in rising traffic fatalities, especially among vulnerable road users, so this is a timely measure.

These active transportation bills also moved forward:
A.B. 361 (Ward): Would allow public agencies to use photo enforcement of cars blocking bike lanes
A.B. 761 (Friedman): Would create a Public Transit Transformation Task Force “to grow transit ridership and improve the transit experience for all users of those services.”
S.B. 712 (Portantino): Would allow tenants to store scooters and bikes in their units

Signs of progress

Two bills that didn’t make it last year are moving forward this session, an encouraging sign.

Free Transit for Youth Pilot
(A.B. 610, Holden): The governor vetoed this last year, citing budget concerns. The budget remains concerning, but the concept of giving free transit passes to young people is gaining momentum, so we hope this pilot gets the governor’s signature this time around.

Automated Speed Enforcement Pilot
(A.B. 645, Friedman): Enforcing speed limits with traffic cameras, which is common in other countries and some U.S. states, has been a tough sell in California. Different versions of this bill died in committee during the past two years. We’re thrilled to see it move to the Senate, though its passage is not assured.

The ones that didn’t make it

Unfortunately, two of CalBike’s high-priority bills died in the Assembly. We hope they’ll come back next year.

Equity-First Transportation Funding
(A.B. 1525, Bonta): Our top-priority bill, this measure would have directed sixty percent of transportation funding to disadvantaged communities. It would have been a significant step toward correcting the racism built into our transportation infrastructure and improving streets in often-neglected low-income neighborhoods. The movement to right historical wrongs by removing freeways and other measures is growing, including at the federal level, so we hope to see another measure like this in the future.

Stop Baseless Searches
(A.B. 93, Bryan): CalBike fought hard for this bill prohibiting police officers from requesting consent to conduct a search if the officer does not suspect criminal activity. Thank you to everyone who emailed their assemblymember about this one.

These bills also failed:

California Bike Smart Safety Handbook
(A.B. 1188, Boerner): It was expected to cost $4.1 million, apparently too much for the legislature to move it forward in this budget deficit year.

Highway Pilot Projects to Reduce Emissions
(A.B. 981, Friedman): We’re not sure why the legislature doesn’t want Caltrans to take all opportunities to reduce the carbon emissions of freeway projects. Sigh.

Bills change as they pass through the legislature and get amended, for better and worse. CalBike keep tabs on all the active transportation measures. Check our Legislative Watch page for the latest on all the bills on CalBike’s radar this year, and watch for opportunities to join our campaigns to pass essential active transportation legislation.

Share post:

More like this
Related

Council Majority Makes Symbolic Vote to Try and Persuade Voters to Vote for Measures K and PSK

At this week’s City Council meeting, the Council held...

Letters to the Editor: A Damning Statement from Oscar de la Torre

The following letter to the editor by SMMUSD School...

Santa Monica DOT Will Provide Updates on Projects at Zoom w/Spoke Next Wed.

SaMoDOT Mobility Staff will present updates on bike and...

OPA Update 10/10/24: Details for Monday OPA Meeting, Airport Conversion Survey, & Things To Do This Weekend

OPA Oct. 14 Monthly Meeting Monday: This month's meeting will be at the 2601 Main...