Discover the heartbeat of Santa Monica through insightful reporting and in-depth analysis. Stay informed with our handpicked news and updates that resonate with our community's unique rhythm. Engage with the stories that drive conversation and connect you to the local scene.
The following article comes to us from Streetsblog San Francisco. Photo: Caltrain in Redwood City, Streetsblog/Rudick
Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy had an op-ed in the Sacramento Bee on Wednesday complaining about the state suing to stop his attempted clawback of $4 billion in federal dollars for California’s high-speed rail. From the article:
As transportation secretary, I want Americans to have access to high-speed rail more than anyone. Too often, however, government is a barrier rather than a partner. Money meant for construction gets gobbled up by consultants fed by a steady stream of government grants. We must make sure American tax dollars are spent effectively today so we can use additional resources for projects that will have a real impact tomorrow. The Hoover Dam took five years to build. The Golden Gate Bridge took four. Both were built when the federal government was a fraction of its size today. The president and I are eager to build big, beautiful things again. No more trains to nowhere.
Sean Duffy
Sorry, no, Duffy does not want Americans to have access to high-speed rail. And yes, the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge were built much more quickly, in an era without environmental reviews or much in the way of worker safety. And of course, Duffy falls on the same hackneyed phrases such as “boondoggle” and “train to nowhere.” He repeats the absurd talking point that trains are supposed to be built exclusively for profit and by private industry. And while he whines about protecting tax dollars, in reality, California is a massive donor state to the federal government, so Duffy is, in effect, trying to prevent the state from getting its own money back.
And what about all the highway boondoggles you’re funding, Secretary Duffy? Those don’t count? And what airline has built its own airports and air traffic control systems? Does Duffy really not understand that all the technology and infrastructure that make our modern aviation system possible, from radar to the jetliners themselves, were and are developed and advanced through massive government projects? And overseas, HSR is profitable, but it requires the government to develop and build the supporting infrastructure, just like with airplanes and cars.
Please don’t tell the Japanese, French, Germans, and Italians that fast rail isn’t profitable. Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Rep. Seth Moulton (D., Mass.) had a succinct rebuttal for Duffy’s “Project 2025” anti-rail talking points, in a Wall Street Journal letter published Monday responding to a separate HSR hit piece:
I conducted a financial analysis of California’s high-speed rail with some Harvard Business School colleagues more than a decade ago, and we came to two conclusions: It will cost more than they say, and it will still cost less than expanding highways or airports. The rail project should be reformed, not tanked.
Seth Moulton
And that’s the crux of it, isn’t it? If Duffy wanted fast trains for Americans, as he claims, obviously, he’d work on getting them funded and built as quickly and efficiently as possible. He would not simply try to pull the plug on HSR in California (and Texas) under the guise of protecting American tax dollars.
Editor’s note: I wanted a break from the fog and cold Bay Area air, so I decided to take a train to Martinez, which was hot and sunny today. It also has a walkable downtown and coffee shops where I can work. Yes, Amtrak takes way longer than driving, but I wrote the first draft of this piece on the train there and finished it on the way back.Given the obvious advantages, imagine how many people would ride trains in California if they were reliable, frequent, and faster than driving?
Damien is the executive director of the Southern California Streets Initiative which publishes Santa Monica Next, Streetsblog Los Angeles, Streetsblog San Francisco, Streetsblog California and Longbeachize.