What Happened at Yesterday’s Metro Board Meeting

Date:

The following article first appeared in Streetsblog Los Angeles.

This morning, the Metro board approved $207 million for two more freeway expansion projects in southeast L.A. County. The approvals include $174 million to add one lane to the 91 Freeway in North Long Beach [staff report], and $33 million to add one to the South Street 605 Freeway off-ramp in Cerritos [staff report], which sets up adding a lane to the mainstem of the 605.

Streetsblog previewed these projects earlier:

This Metro eastbound 91 Freeway widening is especially alarming as it will increase tailpipe pollution in an already pollution-burdened community that is 69 percent Latino and 28 percent Black. So much for Metro and Caltrans lip service on advancing equity.

Metro has long used misleading language to obscure the impacts of its highway expansion projects (including continuing to list them under a “Less Traffic” category on its project webpage, when these projects will generate more traffic.) Metro frequently terms freeway expansion as “gap closure,” “safety improvements,” “operational improvements,” “freeway modernization,” “local subregional projects,” etc. These obfuscations often come at the end of sentences like “We’re not approving freeway expansions… it’s freeway modernization” (Metro boardmember Fernando Dutra, May 2021).

This week, writing at The Source, Metro spokesperson Steve Hymon expanded the agency’s lexicon with what appears to be a new Metro freeway widening euphemism: adding one more lane to the 91 Freeway is “the elimination of a lane reduction.”

It’s not freeway expansions… it’s eliminating freeway lane reductions.

This bizarre wording seems to imply that there is some natural ideal state to freeways (apparently many many lanes) and that Metro and Caltrans are trying to achieve it by “eliminating reductions.” Really, Metro? Hopefully someday Metro will also look to eliminate bus lane, train track, sidewalk, and bike lane reductions, too? Maybe start in the shadow of these two “multimodal” freeway projects.

Author

About The Author

Joe Linton
Joe Lintonhttp://la.streetsblog.org
Joe Linton is editor of Los Angeles Streetsblog. He is also a longtime urban environmental activist. His main areas of interest have been restoring the Los Angeles River and fostering bicycling for everyday transportation. He’s worked for many Los Angeles livability non-profits, including Friends of the L.A. River, Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition, C.I.C.L.E., Livable Places, and CicLAvia. He also served as deputy to Los Angeles City Councilmember Ed Reyes.

Share post:

More like this
Related

Commissioner Lara and Senator Allen Limit “the List” as Consumer Protection Measure is Signed by Governor

California wildfire survivors will now face one less burden...

OPA Update 10/13/25: OPA Monthly Meeting Tonight/Monday, Main St. Festival This Weekend, & Things To Do This Week

OPA Oct. 13 Monthly Meeting Tonight/ Monday: This month's meeting will be at the Ocean Park...

Newsom Signs SB 79, Legislation to Spur Housing Production Near Transit

Governor Gavin Newsom has signed Senate Bill 79, the Abundant &...

Zbur Legislation to Expand Electrification Signed by Governor

California cities and counties with populations over 75,000 will...